RayOne EMV

Key information

• Up to 1.5 D increased range of focus with an emmetropic target.^1,4,6
• Low levels of contrast sensitivity¹ and dysphotopsia², similar to standard monofocal lenses.
• Positive spherical aberration design provides a natural range of vision.^2,4

Designed to provide:

• Smoother, blended transition between the eyes when compared to monovision with standard monofocals, maintaining binocular stereoacuity and reducing asthenopia.
• High quality spectacle-free distance vision.
• Reduced pupil dependency, for optimised performance under low light conditions.
• Reduced sensitivity to decentration and tilt compared to other IOL designs.
• Complements the eye’s natural level of spherical aberration.
• Fully preloaded across the entire power range.

360° Optimised barrier to reduce PCO

Rayner’s 360° Amon-Apple Enhanced Square Edge creates an optimum barrier to reduce epithelial cell migration including at the haptic-optic junction.^15,16

Extremely low Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates, comparable with hydrophobic acrylic lenses with square-edge optics.¹⁵

References:

1. Ferreira T. et al. Clinical outcomes comparison EMV vs. Eyhance, Symfony, Vivity. Presented at Winter ESCRS 2022. 

2. RayOne EMV: First Clinical Results, Rayner. Oct 2020. 

3. Rayner RayPRO, data on file. 

4. Rayner, data on file.

5. Rayner Peer2Peer webinar. May 2022. 

6. Royo, M. RayOne EMV and TECNIS Eyhance: A Comparative Clinical Defocus Curve. Data on file. 2021. 

7. How to Choose the Right Solution for Your Patients, CRSTE April 2021. 

8. Bhogal-Bhamra GK, Sheppard AL, Kolli S, Wolffsohn JS. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(1):48-53. 

9. Rayner. Data on File (RDTR 1937). 

10. Nanavaty MA and Kubrak-Kisza M. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017; 43:558-563. 

11. Rayner, PMCF data on file. 

12. McLoone E, Mahon G, Archer D, Best R. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85:543-545. 

13. Tomlins PJ, Sivaraj RR, Rauz S, Denniston AK, Murray PI. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40:618-625. 14. Rayner, data on file. 

15. Mathew RG, Coombes AGA. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010 Nov-Dec; 41(6):651-5. 

16. Vyas AV, Narendran R, Bacon PJ, Apple DJ. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33:81-87.

RayOne injector

For predictable and efficient delivery, every time.

In a comparative study of six market-leading preloaded delivery systems

1. RayOne received the maximum score for ‘ease of use’ for all delivery steps:

• Opening of pack
• OVD priming
• Advancing OVD in the nozzle
• Nozzle insertion into the wound
• IOL delivery

2. RayOne was the least time consuming system for delivering the IOL

3. RayOne showed less injector tip damage post-insertion than 50% of the tested delivery systems

4. RayOne showed minimal wound stretch compared to other tested delivery systems when through a 2.2 mm incision

Nanavaty MA and Kubrak-kisza M. J Cataract Refract Surg.2017 Apr;43(4):558-563

Ultrasert (U) (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.), iTec (iT) (Abbott Medical Optics, Inc.), Eyecee (E) (Bausch & Lomb, Inc.), iSert (iS) (Hoya Surgical Optics, Inc.), RayOne (R) (Rayner Intraocular Lenses Ltd.), and CT Lucia (CT) (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG). All trademarks are property of their respective owners

RayOne EMV technical spec.

For Contact Ultrasound, the estimated A-constant is 118.0

Please note that the constants indicated for all Rayner lenses are estimates and are for guidance purposes only. Surgeons must always expect to personalise their own constants based on initial patient outcomes, with further personalisation as the number of eyes increases.

RayOne EMV regulatory

Not all products or offerings are approved or offered in every market and approved labelling and instructions may vary from one country to another. For country specific product information contact your local distributor or email iol_enquires@rayner.com.

Rayner hold a selection of EC certificates for various products. Please contact the Regulatory Affairs team for the current version.

Please see Full Instructions for Use at: eifu.rayner.com

RayOne Aspheric peer review papers

• Findl O, Koshy J, Hirnschall N, Vyas A, Narendran R, Crnej A, Gangwani V, Nishi Y and Maurino V: Comparing capsular bag performance of a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic intraocular lens: A randomised two-centre study. European Journal of Ophthalmology 2018 March
• Yagci R, Uzun F, Acer S, Hepsen IF. Comparison of visual quality between aspheric and spherical IOLs. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep-Oct;24(5):688-92
• Mathew RG. & Coombes AG. Reduction of Nd:YAGCapsulotomy Rates After Implantation of a Single-Piece Acrylic Hydrophilic Intraocular Lens With 360° Squared Optic Edge: 24-Month Results. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010 Nov-Dec;41(6):651-5
• Vyas AV, Narendran R, Bacon PJ, & Apple DJ. Three-hundred-sixty degree barrier effect of a square-edged and an enhanced-edge intraocular lens on centripetal lens epithelial cell migration Two-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Jan;33(1):81-7
• Werner L, Mamalis N, Pandey SK, Izak AM, Nilson CD, Davis BL, Weight C, Apple DJ. Posterior capsule opacification in rabbit eyes implanted with hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses with enhanced square edge. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Nov;30(11):2403-9
• Tandogan T, Auffarth GU, Choi CY, Liebing S, Mayer C, Khoramnia R. In vitro comparative optical bench analysis of a spherical and aspheric optic design of the same IOL model. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb 8;17(1):9.
• Nanavaty MA. & Kubrak-Kisza M. Evaluation of preloaded intraocular lens injection systems: Ex vivo study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Apr;43(4):558-563.

RayOne EMV videos

RayOne EMV marketing materials